How did you learn how to condense your work, product or new project into twenty seconds?
Guy Kawasaki wrote a fascinating post on all the things we had to unlearn or learn anew from our academic experiences. He has a point--most of us were taught to write five- to ten-page papers, not three bullet points or a twenty-second elevator speech (or my own favorite Two-Second Teaser Statement).
His post got me to wondering--is the college ten-page paper really responsible for all those bad PowerPoint presentations we've seen, with too much extraneous information crammed into them to make them look more informative than they actually are? Do most presenters write their talks the night before, like a college student, and hope that no one notices that it's really just one core idea that they are expounding on? Are we really taught to favor length over brevity in the academic world and then brevity over substance in the work world?
I'm not sure that I do agree. For one, college is first place many people begin to apply critical thinking skills and are actually encouraged to look at ideas/concepts/issues/questions in depth. I actually believe that many high school students could give a twenty-second statement but would be lost if they had to expound on that idea or (heaven forbid!) write ten pages about it, with proper documentation and information based on sources other than their own heads. I think that the purpose of the five- to ten-page paper is to teach people how to do more extensive research, explore an idea more thoroughly and compile information in an organized format.
But I'm digressing a bit, because my favorite bit of Guy's post is here, under the "things most of us didn't learn in college" category:
How to explain something in thirty seconds. Unfortunately, many
schools don’t have elevators or else students would know how to explain
things in a thirty-second elevator pitch. Think mantra (three words), not mission statements (sixty words). Think time, not
money, is the most important commodity. Think ahead, not on your feet.
At the end of your thirty-second spiel, there should be an obvious
answer to the question, “ So what?” If you can’t explain enough in
thirty seconds to incite interest, you’re going to have a long, boring
career.
Ah, yes! The merits of ten-page papers aside, this is definitely true. There is an art to the twenty-second statement, and it's vitally important that the statement not receive a shrug and a "so what?" after its delivery.
I've said it over and over--your twenty-second statement (following your two-second teaser, of course!) needs to be fun and engaging. The point is not to encapsulate your business; the point is to show who you are and to get the listener engaged and asking questions. When I was an actor, agents always recommended putting something fun at the end of the resume--something that would raise and eyebrow or garner a smile from a client sifting through dozens of photos and resumes. In my case, I added "hula-hoop champion" and "blood-curdling screams" to my CV, both of which I'm quite good at.
And it never fails--if there is ever a client holding my resume in his hand who says with a smile, "Now, I have a question... ," my immediate response is, "Well, yes, I can give your presentation while hula-hooping. But it'll cost you extra." :-)
And--zing!--there we have a connection. Now, what if the client doesn't appreciate your humor, you ask? Well, I don't tend to end up working with those clients. I believe strongly that one can be professional and still be authentic. My personality is ultimately professional but also perky and engaging; that's who I am. And if a prospect thinks that hula-hooping is too unseemly, then I probably am not the best fit to be a spokesperson for their organization, anyway. I don't have, as Guy says, "a long, boring career."
So have fun with your twenty-second. Be yourself. Be authentic. Have fun. Practice on a colleage and see if she starts asking you more questions or shrugs a "so what" back at you.
So... what have you done to craft a more engaging elevator speech?